Last week saw Witney 3 play their last match
of the season with all pressure off due to
finally escaping relegation.
|
Witney 3 |
vs. |
Cumnor 1 |
1 |
Kennedy, Ben ( ) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Stevens, Gareth (140) |
2 |
Turner, Roger N (138) |
½ |
- |
½ |
Sayers, Mark (138) |
3 |
Weston, Richard (135) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Glenn, Liam (120) |
4 |
Kennedy, Alan (128) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Bennett, Steven (110) |
5 |
Kilbride-Newman, Bob
(124) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Plant, Kevin (105) |
6 |
Gilders Ian (109) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Cluley, Graham (-) |
Match played on 16 Apr 2012. |
And so, with a carefree
attitude we took on the runaway divisional
leaders.
It was all fairly close with
most of the exchanges being even with a couple
of matches playing fairly quickly.
Bob was an early finisher
although I didn’t see much of it and Ian and I
weren’t too far behind.
Ian had a good win and for
the second match in a row I managed to squeeze a
draw from a lost position.
I didn’t see Alan crumble to
a loss or Richard losing his but we were left
tied with one match left.
Ben, in a tight position,
worked a flank open and positioned his rook and
queen on it before sending both pieces towards
his opponents king.
With his opponents king
running around his queen was attacked but found
Rc1 which killed the game off and a victory in
our last match.
If only we’d played like that
earlier in the season!
- Roger
p.s. Attached are my last two
games where my opponents demonstrated 1. How not
to win when 6 pawns to 2 up in the ending and 2.
How not to win when you go a Queen for Rook
exchange up :-)
Witney 3 went into tonight’s
match requiring at least a draw to avoid
relegation.
The night started well
Richard aggressively attacking his opponent
until he could take no more ... 1-0. All the
other boards were about even except Alan had
gone the exchange up.
|
Cowley Workers 1 |
vs. |
Witney 3 |
1 |
Jenkinson, Neil J (139) |
½ |
- |
½ |
Kennedy, Ben ( ) |
2 |
Willis, Graham (118) |
½ |
- |
½ |
Turner, Roger N (138) |
3 |
Bruton, Roger (108) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Weston, Richard (135) |
4 |
Malek, John ( ) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Kennedy, Alan (128) |
5 |
Alvarez, Francisco (-) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Kilbride-Newman, Bob (124) |
6 |
Coleman, Michael C (93) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Flory Mark (116) |
Match played on 02
Apr 2012. |
Next to finish was Mark who
had managed to work his opponent into a
dangerous mating position and despite throwing
pieces in the way he eventually caved in ...
2-0.
Up on top board, playing for
the first time for a while, Ben had stifled his
position and agreed a draw ... 2½-½ only a draw
to go as I dropped the first of many pawns.
Bob had managed to get an odd
exchange of queen for a piece and rook but
slowly lost his extra piece and it was only a
matter of time before he was beaten ... 2½-1½
Alan, after a promising
start, found himself loosing pawns and then the
game all too swiftly ... 2½-2½
So it was down to me, with
king, rook and 2 pawns against king, rook and 6
pawns ... not looking good!
My opponent first threw away
one pawn defending the back rank mate and then
started looking at his clock ... less than 10
minutes ... I had 55!
First he offered a pawn
exchange which quickly looked to lose a pawn
after check, he defended with his rook losing
another pawn. He skewered my king and remaining
pawn but I soon took another of his pawns
followed by a quick exchange. We were now down
to King and Rook against King, Rook and one
pawn. I offered the draw which was accepted due
to lack of time ... 3-3.
So another match of dubious
play but we secured the point needed and we
avoided relegation.
Hopefully we’ll play a lot
better next year!
- Roger
It’s been a while since my
last report and there hasn’t been much to report
other than Witney 3 lost again! Our run of form
has put us into a do or die situation but
everything is still in our own hands, we can
avoid relegation.
|
Witney 3 |
vs. |
Bicester 2 |
1 |
Turner, Roger N (138) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Earl, Chris (121) |
2 |
Weston, Richard (135) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Burcham, Anthony (121) |
3 |
Kennedy, Alan (128) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Corraine, Nicola ( ) |
4 |
Kilbride-Newman, Bob (124) |
½ |
- |
½ |
Cheesman, Colin J (99) |
5 |
Coburn, Matt (119) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Dilly, Suzanne (94) |
6 |
Gilders Ian (109) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Hartmann, Per (86) |
Match played on 19
Mar 2012. |
Last night saw us take on our
rivals for relegation and a win was the minimum
requirement and it proved that we like to give
Mike Truran kittens whenever he watches.
The night started off well
enough with most of the matches being fairly
even, although I was determined to give my
opponent a positional edge!
With just about 2 hours
played, did I really manage that long? My
opponent decided give me a piece which I duly
accepted and then proceeded to gain his final
minor piece for a pawn and he resigned shortly
after.
|
|
|
Alan’s
game for the swindlers out there! |
|
|
Within moments Bob had agreed
a draw, a game I saw very little but the outcome
did appear to be fair. 1½ – ½ and we’re off to a
good start.
Alan had slowly contrived to
get into a poor position and the exchange down
when his opponent decided to give the game away
as Alan swindled himself another win, see below!
2½-½ it’s been a while since we last had this
position with 6 opponents.
The three remaining games all
went to the wire.
Matt slowly manoeuvred
himself into a tight corner leaving his opponent
with most of the moves and with time nearly up
resigned. 2½-1½
Ian, had worked his position
nicely and was material up and was the main
cause for Mike’s attempt at kittens as the
clocks slowly drifted to zero. Ian had about 8
minutes to his opponents 1 min 30 sec, he
decided not to go for the two move mate but
bring his king into being attacked. Then a few
moves later he decided to double defend instead
of going for the now mate in 4! Each and every
move TN’d Mike and he lost all hope of
predicting Ian’s moves :-). It wasn’t long
before Ian’s opponents clock fell and his dogged
defence won through. 3½-1½.
Match won but we needed at
least 4 points to keep our destiny firmly in our
hands.
Richard played his usual game
of expansive decisiveness and was fast running
out of options and pieces. Fortunately his
opponent was running out of time. With less than
30 seconds left on his opponents clock they
queened a pawn and went looking for mate. This
may have been achieved with 2 or more minutes on
the clock as Richard had enough material to keep
hiding and eventually his opponents clock fell,
Richard had used his clock much better as he
finished with 7 seconds on his clock! 4½-1½.
One lesson to be learnt from
Richards opponent at the end. If he had taken
Richards two remaining pawns, easily achieved in
the position, Richard would have been left with
insufficient material to mate. When the clock
fell, Richard would not have been able to claim
the win and it would have been drawn! Lucky for
Richard that he went for the mate :-)
Next up is Cowley Workers
after Bicester 2 have played their last game and
we will know exactly what is required.
- Roger
Witney 3’s second away match
ended with their second away loss but not out
played.
The night started with an
early finish for Helen who, after losing a piece
early on, was finished off efficiently by her
opponent (0-1).
|
Banbury 2 |
vs. |
Witney 3 |
1 |
Waddell, Mal (145) |
0 |
-
|
1 |
Turner, Roger N (132) |
2 |
Martin, Nick (140) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Coburn, Matt (123) |
3 |
Rumsby, Stephen (132) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Murray, Jon (92) |
4 |
Rowan, Daniel (102) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Kilbride-Newman, Bob ( ) |
5 |
Freshwater, Keith (102) |
0 |
-
|
1 |
Partridge, Tim R (89) |
6 |
Fox, Chris (94) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Meyrick, Helen (38) |
Match played on 15 Nov 2011. |
My opponent succumbed to a
diversionary move from my queen losing a central
pawn and then proceeded into a 5 move combo
resulting in me going the exchange up. I soon
had half his pawns before he started to counter
attack but whilst giving up a piece in an
attempt to get a perpetual, resigned when I
completed the blocking of his checks (see below)
(1-1)
Matt soon followed after
having taken a pawn in the centre of the board
found his position collapse and his opponent
took full advantage (1-2).
|
|
|
Roger Turner vs.
Mal Waddell |
|
|
Tim had an almost blocking
pawn pattern but with a vital spare pawn on one
side. This made all the difference when his
opponent couldn’t defend both edges of the board
and resigned as Tim was two moves from promoting
a pawn (2-2).
With the match finely
balanced Bob had got into a pawn a rook ending
with an extra pawn. Unfortunately he couldn’t
convert this advantage as his opponent
confidently marched his pawn to promotion and
there was no way back (2-3).
Jon, outgraded by 40 points
on board 3, put up a decent battle before
eventually going down. After both players had
castled queenside, he looked to have a powerful
three-pronged attack with queen, rook and
knight. But he was unable to force a
breakthrough (and was left wondering all night
whether a knight sacrifice might just have done
the trick). Queens were exchanged and that led
to an exciting end game in which both players
had strong back rank attacks with doubled-up
rooks and in each case a solitary pawn defending
an exposed king. However, the Banbury player
defended a tricky position very well to prevail
as Jon ran out of time in a by-then lost
position (2-4).
Again we lost but with a bit
more luck could have drawn or even won the
match.
- Roger
In the first away fixture of
the season Witney 3 suffered their first loss
after a promising start.
|
Didcot 2 |
vs. |
Witney 3 |
1 |
Richardson, Alan W (134) |
0 |
-
|
1 |
Turner, Roger N (132) |
2 |
Duck, Mike J (132) |
0 |
-
|
1 |
Coburn, Matt (123) |
3 |
Atkinson, John (127) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Flory Mark (116) |
4 |
Thetford, Roger (127) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Gilders Ian (110) |
5 |
Harkins, Sam (-) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Murray, Jon (92) |
6 |
Moon, Jonathan (76) |
1 |
-
|
0 |
Kilbride-Newman, Bob ( ) |
Match played on 09 Nov 2011. |
My match finished very early.
I had a below par position when my opponent
tried to squeeze the little room I already had.
Fortunately for me it left him suitably exposed
and with poor decision making I soon had taken
his two central pawns and was bearing down on
his Rook through his knight. He resigned whilst
I was plotting my next incisive move and we were
only at move 16! (1-0)
|
|
|
Roger Turner vs.
Alan Richardson |
As I checked the other games
it became clear that we were on for an iffy
night, Matt was in a tight battle, Mark was
equal, Ian had a slightly better position, Jon
was looking worse and Bob had an exchange up but
for a very poor position.
Mark and Jon were first to
finish, with Jon’s position slowly worsening his
opponent got his queen in where it hurts and it
was all over. Mark had transferred his game into
who could get the back rank mate first and with
a subtle combo lost it to his opponent. (1-2)
Bob had somehow managed to
extract himself from a very poor position to a 2
rook vs rook and bishop with two passed pawns
ending and he was getting the better of his
opponent. With his opponent less than 15 minutes
to go and Bob with over an hour maybe a slower
approach to the end could have been better as
Bob soon undone his good work losing the
exchange and a pawn was promoted. 1-3. Matt had
managed to grind out his position and was nicely
positioned when his opponent decided enough was
enough. (2-3)
Ian was left with the match
well positioned but alas he was not. He was down
to rook and knight against a queen and a broken
zigzag pawn line of defence. There was one pawn
short of being able to stop the queen or the
force of pawns with the king and he soon lost
most of his pawns before the end was made. (2-4)
Although we were out graded
on the top 5 boards we gave a good account and
with a bit of luck may have got a draw.
- Roger
Witney 3 started their
campaign snatching a victory from what looked
like defeat at the hands of Oxford University 2.
|
Witney 3 |
vs. |
Oxford Univ
2 |
1 |
Turner, Roger N (132) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Henbest, Kevin B (140) |
2 |
Kennedy, Alan (126) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Irving, Alastair (119) |
3 |
Coburn, Matt (123) |
0 |
- |
1 |
Hewitt, David (110) |
4 |
Flory Mark (116) |
½ |
- |
½ |
Belding, Stephen (94) |
5 |
Gilders Ian (110) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Finkelstein, Noam (-) |
6 |
Murray, Jon (92) |
1 |
- |
0 |
Craciun, Stefan (-) |
Match played on 17 Oct 2011. |
After swiftly going a pawn up
in the opening I soon managed to get my knight
in a tangle and lost my bishop trying to
recover. Reeling from side to side over the next
few moves I was dealt a swift KO from my
opponent. Not a good start following an
undefeated year! (0-1).
Matt was soon to follow after
his opponent played a known but unpractised
opening for Matt and found himself ground out to
a loss (0-2).
Mark tied himself up with a
tricky ending of Pawns and minor pieces and
quickly agreed a draw (½-2½).
At this stage Alan was in a
tight position, Ian despite being a piece and a
pawn up in the opening , had lost his advantage
and was doing his best to let his opponent’s
queen and rook get behind him and Jon was
looking like he was going nowhere and getting ½
from the three games was looking our best
result.
Alan carried on and as his
clock ticked down, his opponent a good 30
minutes ahead, he managed to wrangle free and a
couple of iffy moves from his opponent and
checkmate was achieved (1½-2½).
Meanwhile, Ian had wriggled
free, swapped the queens off and was pawns up
with a rook each. Taking the first opportunity
to remove the rooks Ian formally proceeded to
force a pawn past his opponents king and with
under a minute left on his clock his opponent
threw the towel in (2½-2½).
Jon had also cleared the
debris from the board and was several pawns to
the good and being very careful not to stalemate
his opponent, finished him off efficiently
(3½-2½).
An incredible comeback from
an almost lost position and Witney 3 continues
from where we left off in Division 4.
- Roger
|